[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:19:37 +1100

We expect Joe Public to be vague about technical terms (calling every cold a "flu" for example) but experts who do it are, what, pushing some dismissive/co-optive agenda? Indeed, it is the "tell" of an expert that they err on the side of precision for technical terminology.

Of course, a usage that people may understand on rdf-dev  maillist  may seem incorrect and unhelpful on xml-dev. If I joined a discussion group of anatomy professors, and insisted on using "duodenum" to mean the whole gastro-intestinal tract (because everyone knows that an upset stomach includes diasters lower down), and that the anatomists were wrong for having this strangely limited and non-holistic view,  should it be regarded as helpful-to-communication or ...umm.. eccentric?

Cheers
Rick

On Wed, 23 Feb. 2022, 19:02 Dan Brickley, <danbri@d...> wrote:


On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 21:05, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> wrote:
"Of course, saying XML I mean XML technology, of which XML syntax and even any concrete XML documents and even their purpose and intent (realistic or not) are but a marginal aspec"

Why not make up your own term, rather than using one thst not only has a simple, clear and defined meaning, but is actually a standard?

Didn’t that ship - the SS Infoset - sail a while ago?

Dan

ps. RDF === Reality Distortion Field; all distortions are wrong, but some are useful


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member