• From: Christophe Marchand <cmarchand@o...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 08:02:38 +0100

+1

Le 16/01/2022 à 19:09, Dimitre Novatchev a écrit :

If we know in advance that some object doesn't have certain properties and abilities, like children, descendants, etc., specifying such properties and abilities for this object contradicts all these principles and is what we call an "antipattern" (a nice synonym for "stupid" and "bloated").

Thanks,
Dimitre

• References:
  • Why does XML call them "attributes" and not name-value pairs?
    • From: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>
  • Re: Why does XML call them "attributes" and notname-value pairs?
    • From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@f...>
  • RE: Why does XML call them "attributes" and not name-valuepairs?
    • From: "Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV)" <brutzman@n...>
  • Re: Why does XML call them "attributes" and not name-value pairs?
    • From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@g...>
  • Re: Why does XML call them "attributes" and not name-value pairs?
    • From: Kit <kit.saels@g...>
  • Re: Why does XML call them "attributes" and not name-value pairs?
    • From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@g...>