[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:42:50 +0000

Yeah! The semantics of semantics. Like the ontology of ontology. Is that meta-semantics, or does meta have a different meaning to the one it is usually given. That is meta-meta-semantics. 

On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 at 18:27, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
I moved in the database world at a time when a lot of people were discussing the question "what is a conceptual schema?", and I decided then that if people couldn't agree what the term meant, I wasn't going to use it. I avoid the term "semantics" for exactly the same reason. (Perhaps it even means the same thing. Assuming that meaning is meaningful.)

Michael Kay
Saxonica

On 8 Jan 2022, at 18:01, Tim Bray <tbray@t...> wrote:

Eighteen years ago, I wrote “On Semantics and Markup”: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/04/09/SemanticMarkup

I think I still mostly believe everything in that essay. It addresses three questions:
  •  When is markup semantic?
  • Is semantic-ness a binary condition?
  • Where do semantics come from?
and ends with this summary: 
  • Descriptive markup is better than the alternatives.

--
----
Stephen D Green


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member