- From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
- To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:42:50 +0000
Yeah! The semantics of semantics. Like the ontology of ontology. Is that meta-semantics, or does meta have a different meaning to the one it is usually given. That is meta-meta-semantics. On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 at 18:27, Michael Kay < mike@s...> wrote: I moved in the database world at a time when a lot of people were discussing the question "what is a conceptual schema?", and I decided then that if people couldn't agree what the term meant, I wasn't going to use it. I avoid the term "semantics" for exactly the same reason. (Perhaps it even means the same thing. Assuming that meaning is meaningful.)
Michael Kay Saxonica On 8 Jan 2022, at 18:01, Tim Bray < tbray@t...> wrote:
I think I still mostly believe everything in that essay. It addresses three questions: - When is markup semantic?
- Is semantic-ness a binary condition?
- Where do semantics come from?
and ends with this summary: - Descriptive markup is better than the alternatives.
--
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|