[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>
  • To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:54:23 +0000

Marcus Reichardt wrote:

> I know of only few XML applications more perverse than XMI, 
> the XML serialization of UML, chock full of XML antipatterns 
> such extra lexical type systems (not DTD/XSD), 
> <field name="name" value="value">, and so on.

Marcus, what is an XML anti-pattern? Are you saying that this:

<field name="elevation" value="12000"/>

is an anti-pattern, whereas this:

<elevation>12000</elevation>

is not?

Does anti-pattern mean bad/undesirable? So this:

<field name="elevation" value="12000"/>

is a bad/undesirable way to write XML, but this:

<elevation>12000</elevation>

is a good way to write XML?

/Roger



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member