• From: Arjun Ray <arayq2@g...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:42:42 -0400

 On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:35:27 +0100, Peter Flynn <peter@s...>
wrote:

| I am not convinced that the campaign for "simplification" of XML is 
| a viable candidate for our attention.

Deep-sixing namespaces would be first on my (rather short) list. 

• References:
  • What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>
  • Re: What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: What does it mean to say that XML was over-engineered?
    • From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>