[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • To: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>,"xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:23:40 -0500


But, but, but, ... Why is space required between attributes? Surely a parser can recognize the start of the next attribute given the end-delimiter of the previous attribute's value, yes?
Because when XML was pulled together in the mid-1990's it was made to be an application of SGML from the early-1980's (retroactively modified a bit to accommodate some of the decisions made in XML).

Such a decision would have made an instance of XML not an instance of SGML.

And just because something is unambiguous doesn't make it meaningful to implement.

I hope this helps.

. . . . . . Ken

At 2021-02-04 18:18 +0000, Roger L Costello wrote:
Hi Folks,

Is the following XML well-formed?

<altitude units="meters"reference="AGL">1000</altitude>

Scroll down to see the answer ...


























No! It is not well-formed. There must be a space before reference="AGL" like so:

<altitude units="meters" reference="AGL">1000</altitude>

But, but, but, ... Why is space required between attributes? Surely a parser can recognize the start of the next attribute given the end-delimiter of the previous attribute's value, yes?

/Roger

_____________

--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) |
Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman |



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member