[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Tomos Hillman <yamahito@g...>
  • To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>, Rick Jelliffe<rjelliffe@a...>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:39:58 +0100

On 12 Jul 2019, 11:24 +0100, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>, wrote:
I don't think you should use nillible for the case of someone who has no middle name. That is simple optionality.

nillible is for a more esoteric purpose: where whether that person has a middle name or not has not been disclosed. This may because you don't know, the client didn't ask, or you dont want to tell. 

I think there's also the use case where a middle name was present (erroneously?) and has been removed, perhaps leaving a modification time stamp attribute.

Pretty horrible way to do it, IMO, but there you go

Thanks,
Tom



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member