[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:13:29 -0500

Think of it the other way around: if the value can't be nill then what point is there in having a default? If it is nill, then you're telling people what value is used instead...

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 7:01 AM Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:
Hi Folks,

The following XML Schema declares an element to be nillable and the element has a default value:

<xs:element name="test" type="xs:string" nillable="true" default="Hello, world" />

That is legal but is it meaningful?

What does this (schema-valid) XML instance mean:

<test xsi:nil="true"></test>

xsi:nil="true" indicates that there is no information available for the <test> element. The default value indicates that there is information available for the <test> element and the information is "Hello, world".

Right?

Isn't that a contradiction?

/Roger


_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php

--
Peter Hunsberger


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member