[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@g...>
  • To: "'John Dziurlaj'" <john@h...>,"'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:11:35 -0400

You should assume that the fragments will be re-ordered. As this is time-series data, each fragment should have either a beginning and ending time-stamp, and perhaps a duration. Fragment order can then be recreated as needed.  

 

The OASIS WS-Calendar technical committee spent several years discussing this and related issues

 

For a fuller conversation on this, you may want to read the WS-Calendar Platform Independent Model

 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-calendar/ws-calendar-pim/v1.0/ws-calendar-pim-v1.0.html

 

Depending on how the data repeats, and if you plan data compression, you may want to read WS-Calendar streams as well..

 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-calendar/streams/v1.0/streams-v1.0.html

 

tc

 

 

From: John Dziurlaj [mailto:john@h...]
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 11:13 AM
To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
Cc: Sam Dana <s.dana@p...>
Subject: Comparing xml fragments

 

Hello,

 

I’m working on a schema where you can have N number of XML fragments of the same record R. Each fragment represents an instance of the same record R at different periods in time. The thought is that people could compare the fragments to see what has changed in the record.

 

These fragments have repeating elements, and I worry that parsers / writers may rewrite the fragments such that the order of their sub elements may change, making comparison difficult. Is this a valid concern, and what can I do about it?

 

Thanks,

 

John Dziurlaj

 

Elections Consultant

Hilton Roscoe LLC
Cell 330-714-8935 Work/Fax 234-706-6434

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member