[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 23:22:07 +0100

On 14/07/18 02:15, Liam R. E. Quin wrote:
[snip]
> So, XML leaves out a lot, and some of it is supplied by other specs 
> (such as infoset) and some of it is deliberately omitted, and some of
> it was omitted by oversight.  I don't think XML::Twig was wrong to
> offer unordered sequences of children (using a hash) as an option.

As an option, perhaps it indicates just how far apart the document
markup world and the programming world were (and remain).

I prefer Norman's original explanation.

///Peter


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member