[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 14/07/18 02:15, Liam R. E. Quin wrote: [snip] > So, XML leaves out a lot, and some of it is supplied by other specs > (such as infoset) and some of it is deliberately omitted, and some of > it was omitted by oversight. I don't think XML::Twig was wrong to > offer unordered sequences of children (using a hash) as an option. As an option, perhaps it indicates just how far apart the document markup world and the programming world were (and remain). I prefer Norman's original explanation. ///Peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



