• From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 20:03:36 +0000

Hi Amy,

> if something claims that it's signed, 
> we should just accept that.

Ah, that's an interesting point. A digsig tool might not produce a correctly formatted <ds:Signature> and therefore it would be useful to validate the <ds:Signature> against the digsig XML Schema. That's an excellent point. Thanks Amy!

/Roger

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Is the XML Schema for XML Digital Signatures needed?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• References:
  • Is the XML Schema for XML Digital Signatures needed?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Is the XML Schema for XML Digital Signatures needed?
    • From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@f...>
  • RE: Is the XML Schema for XML Digital Signatures needed?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Is the XML Schema for XML Digital Signatures needed?
    • From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@f...>
  • RE: Is the XML Schema for XML Digital Signatures needed?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: Is the XML Schema for XML Digital Signatures needed?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>