[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Andrew Sales <andrew@a...>
  • To: Frank Steimke <f-steimke@b...>
  • Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 22:17:24 +0000

It's a reality which (again) the publishing sector has been living with since ever publishers started using markup.
They acknowledge or cope with it to a greater or lesser degree: the old-style trope was to have an "authoring DTD" and a "publishing DTD", the latter more finely attuned to publication needs.
Nowadays, things like Schematron's phases also address this need quite elegantly.

Andrew

On 6 January 2018 at 13:02, Frank Steimke <f-steimke@b...> wrote:
This Idea is supported very well in the Oxygen Product: there you have so
called "validation scenarios", which is essentially a combination of
Schemata. You could have one validation scenario for "work in progress"
documents, and another scenario for "final" documents, both for the same
namespace. I would think that both scenarios would share the same XSD
Schema, but would differ in a "weak" vs "strong" Schematron Schema. In the
Oxygen IDE, it’s the users choice which scenario should be applied.

Out tool for validation and assessment, which I have mentioned in the mail
from Jan. 4th, tries to implement this idea of different validation
scenarios as a java library. Since there is no user interaction, you need
some mechanism to find out which scenario shall be applied. This can be any
XPATH expression. In the example given , I would think of a @status flag.

Frank

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@s...]
Gesendet: Samstag, 6. Januar 2018 10:13
An: bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
Cc: Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...>; xml-dev@l...
Betreff: Re: Need a language whiz: An XML Schema "specifies" how
data is to be structured? "describes"? "constrains"?

>
> Theoretically, although I have never seen it with XSD and would
> probably think it was a weird use of the language, you could have
> multiple schemas for validating documents in the same namespace.

I have seen one client who was attempting to do this: essentially applying
stricter validation to "finished" documents than to "work in progress". It
proved quite difficult to manage the maintenance of different versions of
the same schema; I think this is something that would benefit from better
support in languages and tools.

Michael Kay
Saxonica
_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support
XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you
must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l....org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l....org List archive:
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php


_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l....org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l....org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member