• From: u123724 <u123724@g...>
• To: John Cowan <johnwcowan@g...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:19:01 +0200

You might want to make your web server serve it as
application/octet-stream or something because my browser wants to
parse it as XML.

The work itself is interesting, though. I recall discussions about a
canonical OWL schema and RDF representation for topic maps years ago
which however wasn't finalized.

M. Reichardt
sgmljs.net

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:04 PM, John Cowan <johnwcowan@g...> wrote:
> To get myself back into ontologies, I wrote an ontology for the Topic Maps
> Data Model.  It's available under the 2-clause BSD license (it says here) in
> Manchester notation at <http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan/tmo.owl>.
>
> Comments welcome.
>
> --
> John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        cowan@c...
> I Hope, Sir, that we are not mutually Un-friended by this Difference
> which hath happened betwixt us.
>      --Thomas Fuller, Appeal of Injured Innocence (1659)
>

• References:
  • An OWL ontology for topic maps
    • From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@g...>