Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Ghislain Fourny <gfourny@i...> wrote: 2. The fact that JSON is smaller/simpler/more lightweight than XML can be advocated reasonably and with objective criteria by, for example, comparing the size of their respective specifications (I mean here the syntax only, not the schema/data model/querying ecosystem around them). The MicroXML spec is actually only about half as long as RFC 7159, for what that's worth. MicroXML provides elements, attributes, mixed content, numeric and built-in named character references, and comments. It does not have DTDs, CDATA sections, PIs, attribute-value normalization, character encodings other than UTF-8, or namespaces. -- John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan@c... You annoy me, Rattray! You disgust me! You irritate me unspeakably! Thank Heaven, I am a man of equable temper, or I should scarcely be able to contain myself before your mocking visage. --Stalky imitating Macrea
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
