[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Tei <oscar.vives@g...>
  • Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 22:51:14 +0200

On 4 May 2017 at 08:37, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> wrote:
> XML was ascendant for 10 years and overhyped. The second 10 years of its
> life its has been descending to be merely used where it is appropriate,
> which is the best any technology should hope for. Classic hype cycle, I
> guess.
>
> But in order to thrive, I think it needs to grow and morph into something
> more. What is the low hanging fruit, that would give a great increase in
> functionality with the maximum ability to connect to existing technology by
> small shims?

I suggest removing these Less than and More than symbols.  I never <3 them.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<note>
<to>Tove</to>
<from>Jani</from>
<heading>Reminder</heading>
<body>Don't forget me this weekend!</body>
</note>

=>

note
 to [Tove] /to
 from [Jani] /from
 heading [Reminder] /heading
 body [Don't forget me this weekend!] /body
/note


(yea, I removed the <?xml too, because between good gentlemen, we have
good defaults)



-- 
--
ℱin del ℳensaje.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: XMON
      • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • References:
    • XMON
      • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member