Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 5/8/2017 2:51 PM, Peter Flynn wrote: I'm not sure it's as complete an answer as you want, but you certainly can use fragment identifiers in XML.I am clearly missing something here: why are people using #fragment identifiers in XML (non-XHTML/HTML5) documents (eg TEI)? "The syntax and semantics of fragment identifiers for the XML media types defined in this specification are based on the [XPointerFramework] W3C Recommendation. It allows simple names and more complex constructions based on named schemes. When the syntax of a fragment identifier part of any URI or Internationalized Resource Identifier (IRI) ([RFC3987]) with a retrieved media type governed by this specification conforms to the syntax specified in [XPointerFramework], conforming applications MUST interpret such fragment identifiers as designating whatever is specified by the [XPointerFramework] together with any other specifications governing the XPointer schemes used in those identifiers that the applications support. Conforming applications MUST support the 'element' scheme as defined in [XPointerElement], but need not support other schemes." https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7303#section-5 Section 6 even mentions the dreaded xml:base: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7303#section-6 Thanks, Simon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
