• From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:46:51 -0400

On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 15:16 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> Well, no, probably they shouldn't have, but this mention of ASN.1 and
> a  potentially major security flaw reminded me of long-ago
> conversations  here about the value or lack thereof of (relatively
> generic) binary formats.
> 
> http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/07/software-flaw-puts-mobile-pho
> nes-and-networks-at-risk-of-complete-takeover/

I don't think we can promise that EXI implementations are more secure
than ASN.1 implementations.

But maybe you saw one of the talks given at Usenix where the
researchers unlock a car remotely using a cellphone, then make it start
the engine. The vulnerability they used (as I recall) involved buffer
overruns in Web services implementations.

Liam


-- 
Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w...>
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

• References:
  • they should've used XML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>