• From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 00:03:13 +0100

On 05/08/2016 02:50 AM, Liam R. E. Quin wrote:

> There were good and well-thought-out aspects to FPIs and a single
> glaring irreconcilable problem that made them useless - resolving
> them (in the 1980s and 1990s) involved spending money, sending faxes
> or US Mail, transcribing data.

I did for a while run an FPI resolver (http://www.ucc.ie/public), but
the task of maintenance took more time than I had available. I still
have the data but it's only of historical interest now. The link now
redirects to the FAQ :-)

///Peter

• References:
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: "Norman Gray" <norman@a...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@c...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: Steve Newcomb <srn@c...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@c...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: Steve Newcomb <srn@c...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@c...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@c...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: Steve Newcomb <srn@c...>
  • Re: SGML default attributes.
    • From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w...>