[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:00:37 -0400

On 9/14/2015 8:43 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Does the presence of a header field in an XML vocabulary turn it into a protocol, rather than merely a declarative description of structure and content?
I have heard people call HTML many things, but I have not heard it called a protocol. I don't think the presence of a header is close to sufficient for declaring something a protocol.

The absence of headers may be a better sign that something is NOT a protocol, but I can imagine a protocol without headers so long as efficiency isn't a primary goal.

Thanks,
Simon


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member