[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 9/14/2015 8:43 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote: I have heard people call HTML many things, but I have not heard it called a protocol. I don't think the presence of a header is close to sufficient for declaring something a protocol.Does the presence of a header field in an XML vocabulary turn it into a protocol, rather than merely a declarative description of structure and content? The absence of headers may be a better sign that something is NOT a protocol, but I can imagine a protocol without headers so long as efficiency isn't a primary goal. Thanks, Simon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



