[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I'm not very knowledgable of XQueryX, but form I interpret from glancing at the spec.... I would never use this.... Xqib I could see of bring of more use than XQueryX.
I was more so referring to the concept of the syntax to be of add on... As a group of syntax that can be use in xslt and xQuery programing(with or with the angle bracket for a more concise typing choice). It doesn't even have to be adopted into to xslt or xQuery spec; just a reference link to this spec(after revising and editing the current spec of XEXPR).
Example:
XSLT:
<xel:while test="xPath expression[condition]">
<xel:do>
<xsl:value-of select="xPath expression" />
</xel:do>
</xel:while>
<!-- Not the same as a choose-when-otherwise instruction. This will loop. Yes we have the for-each instruction, but this is more of a set deal-->
XQuery:
for $x in (xPath expression)
xel:while (xPath expression[condition])
xel:do (<h1>{expression}</h1>)
(: it's rough, but in hope in just conveying my vision to you :)
----end of example----
I do not aim to offend xQueryx with my early remark toward it.
Thank you for taking the time to read and reply.
E-S4L
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 4:58 PM, "Michael Kay" <mike@s...> wrote:
>
> XQueryX
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



