[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Good point. Good information exchanges must support learning and evolution. The use of Other is a learning opportunity. You may learn that your partner is simply unreliable, or you may learn that you left out something big, or you may simply be harvesting potential examples for eventual inclusion in Rev +1. On the other hand, it may be entirely legitimate to refuse to "accept" a given message if it uses "Other" depending upon how critical it is to know that answer. tc -----Original Message----- From: Michael Sokolov [mailto:msokolov@s...] Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:33 AM To: Costello, Roger L.; xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: The real world doesn't have an "other xyz", neither should your XML On 2/9/2014 9:27 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I see many XML instances (and corresponding XML Schemas) with an "other" catchall element. > > I wish to convince you that an "other" catchall element is contrary to one's objectives and should be avoided. > Roger - there is a tradeoff to everything. If you force people to choose among categories that don't fit, they may just walk away. I can't count the number of surveys I have declined to fill out for that reason. -Mike _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



