[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 00:36:44 -0500

On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 16:20:27 +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> The issue for corporate coding is not whether a well-managed disciplined
> group of experienced programmers can turn out maintainable Perl (or any
> language) code with the benefit of hindsight, but how fast the code sinks
> into maintainability as soon as someone drips the ball (wrong design, wrong
> review process, wrong experience, wrong texting, etc).  I don't think Perl
> has a good track record, based on what I have seen at least. Imho it is too
> risky.

Bravo.

In an earlier encounter on this list, I got some pushback from people 
who said parsing XML with regular expressions worked for them. I 
believe them.

I just don't want to maintain their code.

Amy!


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member