• From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
• To: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@g...>
• Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 04:21:17 +0000

On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 9:31 PM, James Fuller
<james.fuller.2007@g...> wrote:
>
> Rule #2 - If you have information that itself does not need to be marked up
> then you might have a candidate for an attribute. Alternately if you have
> content that you insist on having no structure/markup then an attribute
> might be for you.
>

<completelyAbsentOfDeepThought>Attributes may be ugly but
schematically designating that an element is atomic and can have no
structure(child elements or attrtibutes is
uglier</completelyAbsentOfDeepThought>

• References:
  • XML attributes are weird
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: XML attributes are weird
    • From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@g...>