[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Steve sez: "Len, I think you're arguing in favor of the rule of law." I'm in favor of burgers after the gig. OTOH, I need stable blood sugar. Consistency or appetite? Data are burgers. XML transactions have to adapt to data on the fly and rejection is adaptation as are other less draconian measures. The appetite determines that. Data can be consistent or it can change. The appetite for change consumes hours the budget. If it is consistent, machines do most of the work. Production consumes the budget. If it has an appetite, humans are in the loops and if so, be sure they understand that trade-off. The greater the appetite for ignorance of the technology, the slower and more complex are the processes consuming budget. OTW, XML transactions are easy to adapt given knowledge of the tools and the concepts of schena/stylesheet design. *Off topic: should schemas and style sheets be the same thing? Law is never static where appetites are changing and if they are changing fast, consistency of the means is the palliative. Rule of law is the rule of men adjudicated by means which if not reliable, are pathogenic. len -----Original Message----- From: Steve Newcomb [mailto:srn@c...] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 2:49 PM To: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: Which is the Authority: The Schema or the Text? Len, I think you're arguing in favor of the rule of law. I just don't think it's very easy these days to get people to face up to the sheer inconvenience of keeping civilization running, much less volunteer to bear any of the cost on their own budgets. It's always somebody else's burden, not theirs. Toward the end of the G.W. Bush administration, I had a bumper sticker on my car that read, "IMPEACH ALL SCOFFLAW PRESIDENTS". Since Obama's election, I've been, uh, unimpressed with the respect for the rule of law demonstrated by his administration. I'm not even bothering to put a new bumper sticker on my car; my rage is exhausted. It's the Zeitgeist, man. These are the Years of Deferred Maintenance for all the institutions of liberty. If somebody asks you why you're ignoring all the public and private law (including XML schemas) that should be constraining your behavior, the following explanation seems to work for the entire Executive Branch of the U.S. government, all U.S. telecom companies, and, I suspect, most federal contractors: "9/11. 9/11! 9/11? 9/11!! 9/11; 9/11. 9/11: 9/11, 9/11, ..." which, roughly translated, means, "It's inconvenient." > It's a messy world and gets messier the longer one ignores the rules. > Creativity and pipelines of data that has to be both correct by > construction and in compliance to enable decoupled processes do not > congeal happily or cheaply. > > len
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



