- From: Michael Sokolov <msokolov@s...>
- To: davep <davep@d...>, xml-dev@l...
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:04:04 -0500
On 12/13/13 3:02 AM, davep wrote:
On 13/12/13 03:53, Michael Sokolov wrote:
On 12/12/13 10:32 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 11:58 -0500, Steve Newcomb wrote:
In my view, what SGML never had, and XML still doesn't have, is a
mechanism for disclosing the semantic intent of a document address.
When I mention an address, what am I talking about? In the absence
of a
characterization of intent, it's extremely ambiguous.
+1
I don't believe that "HTTP Range" cuts it, as putting # on the end of a
URI is not out-of-band, and still only gives two options (the resource
itself or the resource as a surrogate).
At one time I hoped topic maps would give us more of this.
Liam
HTML has it though: it's the content of the A tag.
<A href="address">what you can expect to find at the address</A>
-Mike
I have a sneaking suspicion that Steve didn't equate such a simple
interpretation with it Mike?
Yes, and I was only half joking. We often gin up complexity where a
simple solution already exists, and this conversation has that smell to
me, but it's too early to judge -- I'll step back and see where it goes.
-Mike
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
Cart
