Re: Small XML languages versus large XML languages

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

From: =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgQmHFhHNraQ==?= <bansp@o...>
To: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:42:48 +0100

Thanks, Uche,

and regarding this one:

On 11/08/2013 09:54 PM, Uche Ogbuji wrote:

http://www.cloudcomputingexpo.com/node/40468

let me just make sure:

"RELAX NG has gained unexpected momentum largely because it's a much earlier tool for modeling common XML constructs"

Did you mean "easier" or is there a concept of an "early modeling tool" that I have managed to stay unaware of? Asking not to nitpick, but rather because I _could_ imagine RNG, or maybe rather RNC, to be addressed as an "early tool" for modeling.

Thanks in advance,

Piotr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Small XML languages versus large XML languages - whichis better?
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>

References:
- Small XML languages versus large XML languages - which is better?
  - From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
- Re: Small XML languages versus large XML languages - whichis better?
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >