• From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:16:57 +0000

Did  Crockford and co emit any cautionary noises when people decided
this was a suitable vocabulary for a database repository ?

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks like the JSON people (or can I just blame Crockford) screwed up
>>> by not thinking about interoperability with XML
>
> No, I don't think they screwed up. I think they made it simple deliberately, knowing full well that when you keep a design simple, you make easy things easier, and difficult things more difficult. But not all JSON users realise the latter consequence until they get to that point.
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica

• References:
  • Best options for converting JSON to XML
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • RE: Best options for converting JSON to XML
    • From: David Lee <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
    • From: "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@m...>
  • Re: Best options for converting JSON to XML
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>