[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • To: Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@g...>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:17:23 -0700

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@g...> wrote:
Multiple hierarchical views of data are good:
 
- hmm, isn't that what XQuery was developed explicitly to achieve?

Well that comment is a head scratcher, but never mind.  I do this pretty much every day in my day job, without the merest shred of XQuery.  As a matter of fact it's pretty interesting that in one of my recent projects I led development of a particularly intensive multi-hierarchical project in pipelining code in Python (the target corpora was represented in XML).  Another group re-implemented it in XQuery, for reasons I fully understand. However, after taking one look at the XQuery the greater update by other participating groups has been through the Python code.

Others could choose differently, of course, but it just shows that there are indeed many ways to skin a cat. Some are actually quite straightforward and others rather less so.

Oh and when degeneration into tabular data is required, you need a good information architect, regardless of what technology you use, because the entire problem space moves from bits to neurons.


--
Uche Ogbuji                                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira                  http://zepheira.com
Author, Ndewo, Colorado                     http://uche.ogbuji.net/ndewo/
Founding editor, Kin Poetry Journal      http://wearekin.org
Editor & Contributor, TNB     http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
http://copia.ogbuji.net    http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji    http://twitter.com/uogbuji


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member