• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:34:13 -0500

> I think it is a sign of what was found with html: the more schemas for a
> namespace, the more that the namespace represents a vocabulary rather than
> a language. Its life.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, I love that.

Thanks,
Simon

• References:
  • How to design XML to have broad utility and yet also enableefficient application processing?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
    • From: David Lee <dlee@c...>
  • Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet also enable efficient application processing?
    • From: "Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@g...>
  • RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
    • From: David Lee <dlee@c...>
  • Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
    • From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@g...>
  • Re: How to design XML to have broad utility and yet alsoenable efficient application processing?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>