• From: "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@m...>
• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:59:44 -0200

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> An argument:
...
> What's wrong with that argument?
>

Uhmmm, everything.

Software can churn away but without the correct data in the correct
syntactic format along with discoverable semantics[1]  for human and
machine processing, you will get wrong or at the very best uncertain
information output. Data that represents information is the reason we
have software for processing.


[1] different people in different contexts have different ideas about
what data may mean


-- 
MLHIM VIP Signup: http://goo.gl/22B0U
============================================
Timothy Cook, MSc           +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
Like Us on FB: https://www.facebook.com/mlhim2
Circle us on G+: http://goo.gl/44EV5
Google Scholar: http://goo.gl/MMZ1o
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>

• References:
  • Argument: Software design is important, data design is not
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>