Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 11/15/13 11:42 AM, David Sheets wrote: The history is on Uche's side. If you want to claim that XML has a data model, that it was "designed for nodes", you have a lot of revisionism to do.After you.This is evasive. You have submitted a claim that this SO issue as an "XML WTF" which is attributable to a type discipline. If you do not defend your claim, we cannot rationally accept it. Further, you made the claim that "XML is not designed for nodes". If you are unwilling to defend this claim, it, too, must be rejected. Are you interested in developing actual, useful theories or simply wasting everyone's time? Indeed. -- Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
