[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@g...>
  • To: Bill Kearney <wkearney@g...>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 17:23:12 -0400




On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Bill Kearney <wkearney@g...> wrote:
Which is a totally irrelevant analogy.    What might have limited a phone’s UI had quite a lot more to do with actual hardware limitations. 

What "actual hardware limitations"?  There are letters on a U.S. phone dial and have been nearly forever.   The bad UI was imposed to keep costs down and monopoly profits up.

What limits programmers from decent UI development is not the technology.  Excuses, sure, much like the notion of ‘data driven’.

True.  First of all, programmers only do UI because no one will pay for properly trained designers to do it.  And that, too, is a matter of keeping costs down and profits up.  If people wouldn't use bad UIs, the products wouldn't sell, but they *do* sell, so why shouldn't companies take advantage of that?
 
--
GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member