[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Also interesting David. I think the distinction I'm trying to draw here is between using raw or low level schema type data to drive an interface and using more descriptive metadata. The former is sort of an engineering first approach; the users will know what fields "A43F67" and "CDF337" mean because thats the data they deal with, as opposed to using a morere top down approach with something like "Diagnostic ICD9 code" and "Procedural CPT code" (though those are still not ideal). It seems like a long time ago that people started preaching the benefits of good metadata, but given the history of this industry I likely shouldn't be surprised that people still don't treat it as a prerequisite to any application or system design.
I agree that a pure, data only, approach isn't likely to work in all but the narrowest of user interface niches. But then again, I don't see how a pure, data only, approach can be viable for any part of a modern systems design...
Peter Hunsberger
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, David Lee <dlee@c...> wrote:
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



