Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 8/28/13 3:57 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote: >> Honestly, lessening the expert/amateur distinction would make a lot of >> these questions just vanish, though. >> > Well, that's interesting. You don't think we benefit from > specialization? We should all be surgeon/plumber/coders? I'm not saying that everyone should be a generalist, but I will absolutely say that: * Doctors need first and foremost to listen to their patients. The "heal with steel" ethic of surgeons is not exactly an ethic. * Plumbers need to take the time to build systems that work in particular contexts, and to make sure that their repairs last. They don't just look at a plan, slap in standard parts and call it a day. * Coders need to be able to listen to humans as much as they need to listen to computers. Too much of what passes for wisdom is bizarre efforts to make humans accept what is convenient for computers. So yes, specialization happens. Assuming that specialists are the ones who should make decisions - that expert/amateur distinction taken too seriously - creates a lot of unnecessary tensions that limits the quality of our work. Thanks, -- Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
