[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 3/24/13 10:55 PM, Rick Jelliffe wrote: > I disagree with Simons problems with schemas, at least i think there are > simple ways to avoid some of the problems: in many recent projects i use > simple highly generic dtds for vocabulary, id and parent constraints > plus schematron for others: but these dont trap me because at any time i > can plonk in processing instructions. It does not hold water to say that > XML has problem X if you simultaneously reject utilizing Xml's tool for > overcoming problem X! Much of the problem is culture. I have few problems with using schemas to codify practice, or as documentation. I have many problems with using schemas as a foundation for all future work. I have severe problems with using schemas to lurch toward the maximum possible straitjacket that can fit some part of a problem. Thanks, -- Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



