- From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:46:13 -0400
I think #1 is a hard call. Most of my tools for processing XML are ultimately Java based. However, I would agree that building a Java pipeline for processing XML and nothing else is highly counterproductive, compared to XQuery, XSLT or XProc.
Kurt Cagle
Invited Expert, XForms Working Group, W3C Managing Editor, XMLToday.org
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:
Hi Folks,
Sin #1: Using Java to Process XML
Sin #2: Designing XML in an Object-Oriented (OO) Fashion
Sin #3: Neglecting the Format of the Data
More ... http://www.xfront.com/3-Sins-of-XML-Usage.pdf
Comments welcome.
/Roger
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
Cart
