• From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:56:48 +0000

Hi John,

Yes, I know it is more complicated. In fact, I am implementing RFC 5322. Here is my actual ENTITY declaration:

<!ENTITY from "From:&mailbox-list;&CRLF;">

Any ideas on an answer to my question?

/Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@c...] On Behalf Of John Cowan
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 12:49 PM
To: Costello, Roger L.
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  Why does validation fail with a named ENTITY for carriage return and line feed?

Costello, Roger L. scripsit:

> I want to specify the format of a "From:" field for email messages. The
> requirement is:

I realize this is only an example, but the definition of what can appear
in a "From:" line is *much* more complicated.  See RFC 2822.

-- 
I suggest you solicit aid of my followers       John Cowan
or learn the difficult art of mud-breathing.    cowan@c...
        --Great-Souled Sam                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• References:
  • Why does validation fail with a named ENTITY for carriage returnand line feed?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Why does validation fail with a named ENTITY forcarriage return and line feed?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>