[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • To: "Michael Sokolov" <sokolov@i...>,"Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:56:16 +0100

Original Message From: "Michael Sokolov" 
> On 10/16/2012 6:47 AM, Andrew Welch wrote:
>>>> 3. Avoid using URLs, the globally unique benefit
>>>> is far outweighed by the confusion cost
>>> Are you recommending that URNs be used rather than URLs?
>> I'm advocating simple strings for simple cases, for example for a
>> config file someone might be tempted to use:
>>
>> xmlns:c="http://mycomp.com/someproduct/v1.1/config/"
>>
>> whereas they could just do:
>>
>> xmlns:c="config"
>>
> My preference is to use the same string for prefix and namespace:
> 
> xmlns:config="config"

In that case, wouldn't it be easier to just do:

    <config.foo>...</config.foo>

and side step the who namespace issue altogether?

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Twitter: http://twitter.com/petecordell
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member