[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • To: David Lee <dlee@c...>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:00:39 -0600

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:55 AM, David Lee <dlee@c...> wrote:
> That's turning MicroXML into JSON, but we already have a perfectly
> good JSON.


I am open for an alternative way of enabling simple DataBinding to common languages with MicroXML.
As it sits I dont see it.

I think that's because you come from a strongly-typed language perspective, and I've definitely paid 3X my fair dues giving the contrary view in this list for more than a decade, and I'm not up for re-hashing. There are many users of XML who don't have that perspective, and who happily use XML "data" binding without strong typing. You don't have to worry about it. You can stick to the standards that scratch your own itch.


--
Uche Ogbuji                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira        http://zepheira.com
Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member