• From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:12:31 +0100

On 17/07/2012 03:15, Liam R E Quin wrote:
>
>> It just disappoints me greatly that XPath, XSLT, and XQuery have this
>> great data model with no standardized way of representing it.
> +1
>
> Both Saxon and Qizx have proprietary ways to serialize it in XML.
>
>

For Saxon: Nodes and atomic values, yes. But function items, no. That 
would be a significant challenge.

(Memo to self: allow serialization of maps...)

Michael Kay
Saxonica

• References:
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basic principles of ...
    • From: BillClare3@a...
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of ...
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basic principles of ...
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@s...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of ...
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of ...
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of ...
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of ...
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of ...
    • From: David Lee <dlee@c...>
  • XDM serialization (was buried in microXML thread)
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • RE: XDM serialization (was buried in microXML thread)
    • From: David Lee <dlee@c...>
  • RE: XDM serialization (was buried in microXML thread)
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>