• From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
• To: "W. Hugh Chatfield" <csi2000@u...>, Len Bullard<Len.Bullard@s...>, Mike Sokolov <sokolov@i...>
• Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 17:38:58 +0000

Hugh,

> The second may revolve
> around the 2 solutions to Maxwells equations.  One solution 
> is for an e/m signal going forward in time - but - the other 
> is an e/m signal going backward in time (usually ignored by 
> physicists).

I'm guessing you're right.  I named my son Jacob Maxwell in honour
of his grandad "Jake", and the famous Scottish physicist.  And
he was "born awesome", so it's got to be right.

>  If you read Gribbins "Schrodinger's Kittens" 
> you can see how treating the second solution as "real" leads 
> to a more satisfying interpretation to Quantum Mechanics than 
> the Copenhagen interpretaton.  
> 
> Now all that is required is figure out an experiment to 
> receive and interpret these backward in time signals.  I have 
> been pondering this for a while - and it does look impossible 
> - yet - maybe if we use entanglement. 

Well, I'm guessing you're right!  If it made Einstein so upset, he had
to be on the right track.  I figure entanglement is what makes us
alive.

:-) 

> I once gave a talk to the Ottawa XML Users group called 
> Quantum Infodynamics - but it seems to be no longer online.  
It was a "light" look at the subject. 

Too bad.  If they ever put out the version for dummies, let me know.

Cheers,
Peter

• References:
  • RE: ANN: the first million prime numbers in XML format
    • From: "=?utf-8?b?Vy4gSHVnaCBDaGF0ZmllbGQ=?=" <csi2000@u...>