• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 22:24:22 +0100

On 04/07/2012 19:49, John Cowan wrote:
> This is absolutely untrue.  The scope of xml:base is at most the root
> element: it cannot affect the DOCTYPE.  Check  the xml:base recommendation:
> not a word about system identifiers.


Sigh. Sorry I have posted enough on public lists that the occasional 
untruth is inevitable. Always happy to be corrected though, thanks.

David

-- 
google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• References:
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basic principles of MicroXML"
    • From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@c...>
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basic principlesof MicroXML"
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>