• From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@i...>
• To: David Lee <dlee@c...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:36:34 -0400

On 06/25/2012 09:44 AM, David Lee wrote:
>
> There is the camp that believes XML should be agnostic about the application layer
> And there is the camp that believes XML should be tailored to make its use in a web browser more usable.
>    
Where do you think include semantics fall?  Seems to me they could 
inhabit either or both (parser and application) layers.  Peter: does 
your proposal address inclusion (like some "micro" analogue to xs:include)?

-Mike Sokolov

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>

• References:
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of MicroXML"
    • From: David Lee <dlee@c...>