[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@c...>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:19:12 -0400

Pete Cordell scripsit:

> Part of me would like to drop &gt; after a customer complained that
> we didn't use it in place of > and the remote system they were
> talking to rejected it.  But maybe that's more motivated by revenge
> and is a step too far!

It's required in XML, because if you need to have "]]>" in character
content, it has to be written "]]&gt;" or the NCR equivalent.  MicroXML
requires all instances of ">" to be "&gt;" for consistency.  However,
this is not true in attribute values, primarily for compatibility with
Canonical XML.  I would consider requests to change this.

-- 
John Cowan                              cowan@c...
            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Humpty Dump Dublin squeaks through his norse
                Humpty Dump Dublin hath a horrible vorse
But for all his kinks English / And his irismanx brogues
                Humpty Dump Dublin's grandada of all rogues.  --Cousin James


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member