[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • To: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:34:14 -0400

Rushforth, Peter scripsit:

> While we seem to be on very different pages hypermedia-wise, you
> appear to have been convinced at one time that links belonged in the
> XML namespace - or perhaps I am missing some other context.
> 
> http://mailman.ic.ac.uk/pipermail/xml-dev/1998-June/004276.html :
> Cowan-XLink-Substantive-5.

Touché.  But that referred to a very different implementation of XLink
based on SGML architectural forms, predating the XML Namespace
spec as we know it by at least half a year.

-- 
You let them out again, Old Man Willow!                 John Cowan
What you be a-thinking of?  You should not be waking!   cowan@c...
Eat earth!  Dig deep!  Drink water!  Go to sleep!
Bombadil is talking.                                    http://ccil.org/~cowan


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member