[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
  • To: Len Bullard <Len.Bullard@s...>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:11:13 +0000

> It won't exactly get reinvented. Mauled and rebranded is more likely.  
> I believe, and John can correct me, MicroXML is a JSON competitor 
> because it turns out XML is not the best solution to the problem it 
> was touted to solve: bits on the wire.  On the other hand, let's say 
> Microsoft makes noise with its Javascript patent, then JSON doesn't 
> look too healthy and that is precisely why markup if not XML was 
> invented and why keeping it free of application layers is A Good 
> Thing.

I thought MicroXML was a document oriented solution.  As such, t needsi
hypermedia controls.

http://blog.jclark.com/2010/12/more-on-microxml.html

If data also benefits in the process, good!

Peter


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member