[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:17:58 +0100


> I agree that &lt; &amp; &quot; and &apos; need to be kept from a 
> usability point of view.
>
>
Only if we're constrained by compatibility and tradition. If we were 
starting anew, It would be easy to define it so there is only one 
special character, namely <, which could be escaped by doubling it. Then 
perhaps use <10> or <0xA> for numeric character references, and <&mdash> 
for named entity references (if we think we need them).

Michael Kay
Saxonica


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member