• From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:27:28 +0100

Uche's post about MicroXML reminded me...

Did we ever discuss the option of allowing & not followed by #, amp;, lt;, 
gt;, quot; or apos; to be considered simply as an & so you could do AT&T? 
This would make manually writing MicroXML a lot easier!

I guess that would be a breaking change which is why it hasn't been 
considered.  Maybe it can be considered for NanoXML!

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>

• References:
  • "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basic principles of MicroXML"
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>