• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:58:10 -0500

Michael Kay scripsit:

> There's no such thing as an XML professional, any more than you can be a  
> screwdriver professional or a fork-lift truck professional. People who  
> define their abilities by the tools they can use proficiently are not  
> professionals, they are technicians; professionals define their  
> capabilities in terms of the problem space, not the solution space.

Quoted for truth.

Note that _qualified_ has different meanings on opposite sides of the
Pond.  Where a Brit may say

	He's qualified, but can he do the work?

a Yank may express the same thought with

	He has the credentials, but is he qualified to do the work?

Note to Len:  Writing and debugging XSLT *is* programming.  Anyone who
can learn to program in XSLT can learn to program in any other language.

-- 
I Hope, Sir, that we are not                    John Cowan
mutually Un-friended by this                    cowan@c...
Difference which hath happened                  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
betwixt us.     --Thomas Fuller, Appeal to Injured Innocence

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@s...>

• References:
  • Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@s...>
  • Re: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>