• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:44:43 +0000

On 19 March 2012 14:36, John Cowan <cowan@m...> wrote:
> Andrew Welch scripsit:
>
>> As far as I know, as we all move towards functional programming we
>> won't have to worry too much about it as it gets taken care of for us.
>
> Good luck with that.

Is that not the case?


>> On this topic (sort of), this is an interesting article I read the
>> other day where they took a different approach:
>> http://martinfowler.com/articles/lmax.html
>
> This is a straightforward three-stage pipeline, where the input and
> output stages have state and the processing stage doesn't.

Ah ok... shame you didn't make it first, you could've made a fortune :)


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• References:
  • Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Using XML (or JSON) for inter-thread communication
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>